Should smoking be banned?
1.Introduction of the topic 2.For 3.Against 4.Conclusion
? Background information:
? 1.harmful to our health
, may cause lung cancer ? 2.pollute the environment ? 3.disturb others who don't smoke ? 4.a waste of money ? 5.the burning stub will be a potential danger,which may lead to a fire
? 1.the government won't benefit from the taxes ? 2.smoking can relive your pressure,otherwise people would have gained more stress
? From my point of veiw ? Personally,I think ... ? Above all,we should...
Introduction of the topic
? We can see such signs as “No Smoking” in some public places, which is a kind of measure taken to ban smoking in public places. However,regarding(concerning) the actions of smoking ban,people hold different opinions.
? For those who are in favor of the idea of smoking,they maintain that,on the one hand,it can get rid of the tiredness and pressure,which will make them refreshed,and that on the other hand,banning smoking will cause severe unemployment because lots of people live on tobacco business.In addition， as we know，the government will not benefit anymore if smoking is completely banned.
But other people consider it very harmful to people’s health.According to the official reports， one person in the world dies from smoking every second.And they have heard the doctor’s warning that smokers are more likely to have lung cancer and to increase their chances of having heart attack.Futhermore,smoking pollutes the air and may cause fire accidents.Thus it has become a major threat to people’s life and property.
? There is some truth in both arguments,but human’s life and property outweighs/overweighs anything else.If smoking brings us illness and death,why not have it banned by the government?Without cigarettes,can’t we come up with better ways to make us refreshed?Therefore,I advocate that smoking be banned so that we can breathe the fresh air and suffer less from the second-hand smoking.
copyright ©right 2010-2020。